The US cycle breaks a record. So now what?

Weekly Market Compass: Many investors are wary that the end is near, but current conditions still look favorable

Jul 2, 2019 | Kristina Hooper, Brian Levitt

  

 

Kristina: As of today, July 1, the US business cycle has set a new record for longevity. It’s a significant milestone, to be sure, but what does it really mean for investors? The answer might not be what you think. To help put this cycle into context, I’m turning over this edition of Weekly Market Compass to my colleague Brian Levitt, Global Market Strategist for North America.
 

Longevity doesn’t equal strength
 

Brian: It’s official! The US business cycle, on its 3,682nd day, has now surpassed the elongated cycle of 1992-2000.1  This cycle has now been going on for longer than The Beatles were together. It has persisted for a more extended stretch than the original run of Seinfeld on network TV. It’s older than Instagram. 
 

While much may be made of this record-breaking day (or not), the age of the cycle, in and of itself, doesn’t really tell us much, just as the age of a human being doesn’t necessarily provide information on the health or productivity of that human being. As an example, consider the careers of The Beatles and their fellow British Invasion band, Herman’s Hermits. The former produced 27 No. 1 hits in eight years, while the latter produced two No. 1 singles in 55 years. The point is that simply knowing the duration of a cycle (or a music career) tells you little about the total output. 
 

How does the output of this cycle compare to that of prior cycles? Despite being the longest on record, the current business cycle has the indignity of being the weakest cycle in the post-World War II period. The cumulative growth over the full period is approximately 20%, or roughly 2% per year; bringing US real gross domestic product (GDP) up from $15.8 trillion in 2007 to $18.9 trillion today.2  Each of the other cycles that had surpassed 20% cumulative growth in real GDP (the cycles beginning in 1949, 1961, 1974, 1982 and 1990) did so on average over 16 quarters — not over 10 years.3 

Duration and magnitude of post-WWII US cycles

Source: Bloomberg, L.P., June 30, 2019. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 
 

The end is near … or is it?
 

Many investors may reason that the record-setting cycle must be coming to an end soon. After all, as the father of English literature, Geoffrey Chaucer, wrote in 1386, “All good things must come to an end.” Fortunately, cycles don’t end simply because they were “good” or because they have aged. Instead, recessions have been the result of significant excess and failed policy. 
 

So where does that leave the US today? In my view, the current open-ended policy environment of modest growth and modest inflation is likely to keep the Federal Reserve at bay indefinitely, which could extend the cycle for longer than most expect. As for excesses, let’s compare the current environment to those that preceded the more-spectacular cycle endings over the past century. 
 

  • Banking crisis of 1929: On the eve of the Great Depression, bank credit had grown 20.9% over the prior year, compared to the current rate of 5.6% and the long-term average of 7%.4
  • Stagflation of 1980: By early 1980, inflation had climbed 14.8% over the prior year, and the Federal Reserve was raising rates rapidly.5  Currently, inflation is sub-2% and inflation expectations are falling.6 The Fed, for its part, has signaled that the next interest rate move may likely be a cut. 
  • Tech bubble of 2000: By the late 1990s, stocks were trading at nearly 30x the prior year’s earnings.7 Stocks were not only expensive compared to their own history but also trading excessively rich compared to all other asset classes. Currently, stocks, which have been trading at 19x last year’s earnings, are moderately rich compared to their history but cheap compared to bonds.8 
  • Housing crisis of 2008: By 2008, US households had compiled debt that was equal to 132% of their disposable personal incomes (DPI), with mortgage debt representing 100% of DPI.9 Following a prolonged deleveraging period, US household debt equaled 98% of DPI at the end of 2018, and has still been falling, with mortgage debt representing only 66% of DPI.10
     

In my view, the lack of excesses suggests that barring a major policy mistake, the current cycle likely has more room to run and more duration records to break. To cautious investors watching as the economic cycle breaks new records and the markets hit new highs, I say that it is likely not too late to participate. As Chaucer said, “Time and tide wait for no (wo)man.”    
 

Kristina Hooper is Chief Global Market Strategist and Brian Levitt is Global Market Strategist, North America at Invesco.
 

Related articles

 

^1 Source: National Bureau of Economic Research
^2  Source: Bureau of Economic Research, June 30, 2019
^3 Source: Bureau of Economic Research, June 30, 2019
^4 Source: Federal Reserve, Haver, May 31, 2019 
^5 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 31, 2019
^6 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., June 27, 2019. Inflation expectations are measured by the five-year/five-year forward inflation breakeven.
^7 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. Stocks represented by the S&P 500 Index.
^8 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., June 27, 2019. The current earnings yield of the S&P 500 Index is 5.20% compared to the 10-year US Treasury rate of 2.00%.
^9 Source: Bloomberg, Dec. 31, 2018
^10 Source: Bloomberg, Dec. 31, 2018

 

Important information

The opinions referenced above are those of Kristina Hooper as of July 1, 2019.

This document has been prepared only for those persons to whom Invesco has provided it for informational purposes only. This document is not an offering of a financial product and is not intended for and should not be distributed to retail clients who are resident in jurisdiction where its distribution is not authorized or is unlawful. Circulation, disclosure, or dissemination of all or any part of this document to any person without the consent of Invesco is prohibited.

This document may contain statements that are not purely historical in nature but are "forward-looking statements", which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Forward-looking statements are based on information available on the date hereof, and Invesco does not assume any duty to update any forward-looking statement. Actual events may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements, including any projected returns, will materialize or that actual market conditions and/or performance results will not be materially different or worse than those presented.

The information in this document has been prepared without taking into account any investor’s investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Before acting on the information the investor should consider its appropriateness having regard to their investment objectives, financial situation and needs.

You should note that this information:
•    may contain references to amounts which are not in local currencies;
•    may contain financial information which is not prepared in accordance with the laws or practices of your country of residence;
•    may not address risks associated with investment in foreign currency denominated investments; and
•    does not address local tax issues.

All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable and current, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Investment involves risk. Please review all financial material carefully before investing. The opinions expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.

The distribution and offering of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons into whose possession this marketing material may come are required to inform themselves about and to comply with any relevant restrictions. This does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.