The maturation of Jay Powell

Or, how a better performance from the Federal Reserve chair gives it more room to operate.

Sep 23, 2019 | Krishna Memani

If you just judge Jay Powell by Trump’s tweets, you are excused for concluding that Powell is the worst Fed chair in modern history.
 

Even if you asked the Fed watchers and commentariat for their opinion of Mr. Powell, you would probably get the same assessment. The fact that he has flubbed all his post-meeting press conferences has certainly not helped. Even with his background as a lawyer, which we can all assume would enable him to employ vague language like the Maestro, his performance was worse than his predecessors, who came from academia. How could anyone have anything but a negative or confused view of Powell’s “midcycle adjustment” statement?
 

But all of that is changing, I think.
 

On September 18, the Fed cut its key policy rates by 25 basis points, which was an expected and relatively benign outcome. Two dissenters didn’t want any cut, but we knew about their views from the last meeting. James Bullard, who wants to be the next Fed Chair, favored a 50-basis point cut, but that was not even in the cards. It was a positioning statement from him more than anything else.
 

Before anyone could plan a port party to celebrate, there was a spoiler to consider–the dot plots. Five members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and regional Federal Reserve Banks still wanted higher rates by year-end, a remarkable revelation given that the next day after the rate-cut announcement the OECD reduced its global growth forecast to the lowest level seen in a decade. Wow. Thankfully, five others wanted no change by year-end, and seven dovish members wanted another rate cut.
 

But the game-saving play really came in the press conference, and it clearly shows that Jay Powell is maturing in the job. Both in terms of getting things done–the pivot in 2018 and the two subsequent Fed cuts in 2019–and not flubbing the press conference.
 

If you play back the press conference, it is remarkable that Powell didn’t give anything away and thus preserved the operating flexibility of the Fed, something neither he nor previous Fed Chairs Janet Yellen and Ben Bernanke for that matter, were able to do.
 

The market, despite first interpreting this rate cut as a hawkish monetary easing, reconciled itself to waiting and watching. In other words, Powell effectively bought himself and the Fed some time. Despite the ingrained marked expectations, the path to the Fed moves is not predetermined, for the first time in a while, and the path remains data dependent. The idea that the data are likely to remain soft for some time is important but somewhat irrelevant for now. To both satisfy they hawks on the committee on the committee and avoid getting the market in a tizzy is exactly what he needed to do. And he did that very well. To top it all off, he dangled the prospect of restarting quantitative easing (QE)–a brilliant move in my opinion.
 

A few more performances like this and we will stop missing his illustrious predecessors.
 

The bottom line is that the Fed cut rates and will very likely cut them further, dot plots notwithstanding. In the end, Powell refrained from being his own worst enemy.
 


Krishna Memani serves as the Vice Chairman of Investments for Invesco.


Related articles

Important information

The opinions referenced above are those of Krishna Memani as of Sep 19, 2019.

This document has been prepared only for those persons to whom Invesco has provided it for informational purposes only. This document is not an offering of a financial product and is not intended for and should not be distributed to retail clients who are resident in jurisdiction where its distribution is not authorized or is unlawful. Circulation, disclosure, or dissemination of all or any part of this document to any person without the consent of Invesco is prohibited.

This document may contain statements that are not purely historical in nature but are "forward-looking statements", which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Forward-looking statements are based on information available on the date hereof, and Invesco does not assume any duty to update any forward-looking statement. Actual events may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements, including any projected returns, will materialize or that actual market conditions and/or performance results will not be materially different or worse than those presented.

The information in this document has been prepared without taking into account any investor’s investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Before acting on the information the investor should consider its appropriateness having regard to their investment objectives, financial situation and needs.

You should note that this information:
•    may contain references to amounts which are not in local currencies;
•    may contain financial information which is not prepared in accordance with the laws or practices of your country of residence;
•    may not address risks associated with investment in foreign currency denominated investments; and
•    does not address local tax issues.

All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable and current, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Investment involves risk. Please review all financial material carefully before investing. The opinions expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.

The distribution and offering of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons into whose possession this marketing material may come are required to inform themselves about and to comply with any relevant restrictions. This does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.