25 or 50 bps? Wrong question and wrong answer

What matters is the Fed signals no rate hikes for a long period of time

Jul 25, 2019 | Krishna Memani

The Fed prognosticators are having a field day ahead of the upcoming FOMC meeting at the end of July.

If you boil down all the rhetoric to the basics, most analyses want to know, at least now, whether the Fed will cut rates by 25 or 50 basis points (bps) in July.

There is not much debate about that anymore. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell had an opportunity to walk the market expectation back and he didn’t, almost ensuring a rate cut.

The proponents of a 25 bps move, including me, argue that the Fed needs to cut rates because inflation is absent, but the underlying economy is strengthening, so a 25-bps cut should be enough for an initial gambit. No need for 50 bps today, additional easing may come later.

The 50-bps camp, on the other hand, argues that a 25-bps cut does not do much for the economy and a 50-bps move ensures the US economy does not fall into a recession. New York Fed President John Williams fueled a frenzy of market speculation when he said policymakers needed to act quickly to lower rates. That of course was later clarified by a New York Fed spokesperson who claimed he didn’t imply a 50-bps cut.

While the debate is a lot of fun for onlookers, all this back and forth, unfortunately, brings back memories of the Kremlinologists who watched the Kremlin balcony on the May Day parade of the old Soviet Union to see which officials were really in power in the Politburo. 

The 25 or 50 bps debate is a similar pointless exercise.

Unless you are a front-end rates trader, the magnitude of the cut does not really matter.

What matters far more is that the initial Fed cut signals that the Fed would not be raising rates for a long period of time.

The debate about the 25 or 50bps debate misses the larger point; the actual impact of rate cuts on the economy is relatively modest.

For a large and diversified economy like the US, a 25 or 50 bps move is unlikely to change the direction of the economy in and of itself.

If the economy is close to a recession, which I believe it isn’t, even a 50-bps cut would not save it this late in the tightening regime.

Similarly, if the economy was slowing, a 25-bps cut alone is unlikely to revive the economy.

In reality, if the US economy was in real trouble, and there was no external stimulus like there was from China in 2015 and 2016, the only policy action that could save the economy and the markets is large-scale asset purchases (LSAP) by the Fed. Just look at the European Central Bank (ECB) for proof – the market expects the ECB will restart LSAP programs to save an economy that was on the verge of a recession.

In the current environment, where the underlying economic momentum in the US economy is quite palpable – 3.7% unemployment, good income growth, rock-solid consumption, decent but not great investment growth and no budgetary fiscal consolidation as far as the eyes can see – what is needed and what the Fed will provide is a signal that they are done tightening and will begin slowly and methodically unwinding the unwarranted rate hikes of 2017-18.

That message is already coming thru, and the size of the Fed cut – whether it is 25 or 50 bps – will not change that meaningfully. So whether it is general secretary Brezhnev in control or Politburo member Andropov rising to power, it does not matter that much. 

In the end, the Fed’s pivot to easier policy is all that was or is needed. The US economy and global markets are in a better place as a result.


Krishna Memani serves as the Vice Chairman of Investments for Invesco.


Related articles

Important information

The opinions referenced above are those of Krishna Memani as of July 24, 2019.

This document has been prepared only for those persons to whom Invesco has provided it for informational purposes only. This document is not an offering of a financial product and is not intended for and should not be distributed to retail clients who are resident in jurisdiction where its distribution is not authorized or is unlawful. Circulation, disclosure, or dissemination of all or any part of this document to any person without the consent of Invesco is prohibited.

This document may contain statements that are not purely historical in nature but are "forward-looking statements", which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Forward-looking statements are based on information available on the date hereof, and Invesco does not assume any duty to update any forward-looking statement. Actual events may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements, including any projected returns, will materialize or that actual market conditions and/or performance results will not be materially different or worse than those presented.

The information in this document has been prepared without taking into account any investor’s investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Before acting on the information the investor should consider its appropriateness having regard to their investment objectives, financial situation and needs.

You should note that this information:
•    may contain references to amounts which are not in local currencies;
•    may contain financial information which is not prepared in accordance with the laws or practices of your country of residence;
•    may not address risks associated with investment in foreign currency denominated investments; and
•    does not address local tax issues.

All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable and current, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Investment involves risk. Please review all financial material carefully before investing. The opinions expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.

The distribution and offering of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons into whose possession this marketing material may come are required to inform themselves about and to comply with any relevant restrictions. This does not constitute an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.